About this page

97 questions collected from IFT All-Hands (Lisbon, March 2026). Re-categorized from scratch — original spreadsheet metadata was incomplete and inconsistently labeled. Each question has an assigned owner, response format, and status. Update the Status column as answers are delivered.

Status legend: open · stage (answered on stage) · wip (in progress) · done (published/delivered)

Priority legend: H (high) · M (medium) · L (low)

Summary

CategoryCountHigh priorityOpen
241424
15615
13913
12512
12812
757
646
525
333
Total975697

Process

Week 1 — Triage & route

  • Corey + Council sign off on category routing and nominated owners for each of the 9 buckets
  • Mark questions answered on stage by changing openstage in the Status column
  • Each nominated owner acknowledges their category and agrees on a response format
  • Council decides which High-priority questions need a response within 2 weeks vs. 4 weeks

Weeks 2–4 — Answer production

  • Engineering & architecture — Logos Engineering FAQ doc (internal first, then public tech explainer for devs)
  • Narrative & positioning — Comms drafts, Council reviews; publish key answers to Logos Press Engine as a standalone piece
  • Status app — Status team dedicated recorded Q&A session (60 min); communities delivery question needs a direct, unfiltered answer
  • Keycard — Council formal written statement on budget/staffing; Keycard team handles tech questions separately
  • Token & economics — Council/Foundation statement; route through legal before any public phrasing
  • Ecosystem dev & circles — EcoDev async written responses; publish to Circles newsletter and internal wiki
  • Coordination & process — PM/Ops converts questions into tracked action items with owners; the answer is the action item
  • Internal comms & tools — IT/Ops quick wins list; resolve source-of-truth and info-stack questions first as they unblock everything else
  • Org & people — Council statement or policy memo; expertise/authority question warrants a principle-level response

Weeks 4–5 — Distribution

  • Single “All-Hands Follow-Up” document compiled from all answers, sent to all CCs
  • Public-facing subset published to Logos Press Engine (narrative, positioning, “why Logos” answers are good candidates)
  • All answers archived internally with links back to source sessions or docs
  • Status team Q&A and any other recorded sessions uploaded (YouTube unlisted or internal archive)

Week 6+ — Feedback & close

  • Short async survey to question submitters: “Was your question answered satisfactorily?”
  • Any unresolved questions rolled into the next quarterly town hall prep or All-Hands
  • Process audit: did every question get a route and a response format? Anything that fell through flagged to Council

Engineering & architecture

Owner: Logos Engineering leads · 24 questions

QuestionPriOwnerFormatStatusNotes
When mainnet?HCouncil / Logos EngineeringCouncil statementopen
What exactly is Logos Chat? Is it different from Status Messenger?HLogos Engineering / CommsWritten FAQopen
Supporting iOS/Android in the Logos stack — when?HLogos EngineeringWritten FAQopen
What does “identity” mean in the Logos Stack?HLogos EngineeringSpec docopen
What happened to operators?HLogos EngineeringWritten FAQopen
Tech stack makes it hard to be productiveHLogos Engineering leadsAction planopen
Uncertainty about available languages for Logos CoreHLogos EngineeringWritten FAQopen
What are the objectives of the testnet? What does success on testnet look like?HLogos EngineeringWritten docopen
Will devs need to write/know C to deploy Logos Apps?HLogos EngineeringWritten FAQopen
If a circle runs a node, are we actually validating transactions and earning PPoS fees, or just a light node?HLogos BlockchainWritten FAQopen
How do we ensure the comm system isn’t taken over or controlled by state actors?HLogos Messaging / VacWritten FAQopen
Mobile resource utilization: bandwidth, battery, disk, risc0, RAM, CPUHLogos EngineeringWritten FAQopen
Extremely ambitious goal — very complex software system with a huge attack surfaceHLogos Engineering / VacWritten FAQopen
Middle steps to ensure all module combinations preserve decentralization, privacy, and securityHLogos Engineering / VacSpec docopen
Are there plans for more execution zones after LEZ? If yes, which?MLogos EngineeringWritten FAQopen
Steganographic transports: mimicking others’ traffic patterns to avoid censorshipMLogos Messaging / VacSpec docopen
Integrating Logos Chat SDKMLogos EngineeringWritten FAQopen
Are there preferred categories of dApps to encourage people to build on Logos?MEcoDev + Logos EngineeringWritten FAQopen
User-friendly distributed DB for app developersMLogos StorageWritten FAQopen
Why 30-second block time? Can it be reduced?MLogos BlockchainWritten FAQopen
Will Nimbus or Status be accessible through the Logos Core app?MLogos Engineering / NimbusWritten FAQopen
How will Nimbus integrate into the Logos Stack and why?MNimbus / Logos EngineeringWritten FAQopen
Logos website should have a copy-pastable example for common Logos operations (e.g. start a storage node)MLogos Engineering / CommsQuick actionopen
Bot trained on specs that reviews PRs for architectural cohesionLVac / Logos EngineeringAction itemopen

Ecosystem dev & circles

Owner: EcoDev team · 15 questions

QuestionPriOwnerFormatStatusNotes
RFPs: what should builders focus on? Is there a list? How does the decision process work for Logos launch priorities?HEcoDevWritten FAQopen
How will you bridge the gap between circles and the tech stack given the late mainnet launch?HEcoDev + CouncilWritten planopen
What are the main success metrics 1 year from now?HCouncil + EcoDevCouncil statementopen
Planning is very endogenous — want more EcoDev and externally-informed prioritiesHCouncil + EcoDevWritten planopen
How many node operators do we need at mainnet launch?HEcoDev + Logos EngineeringWritten FAQopen
Circles: how much does it contribute back to Logos tech? Is it just use case discovery?HEcoDev + CouncilWritten FAQopen
Lambda Prize: how to ensure people stay involved?MEcoDevWritten planopen
We need more CC involvement in social media posts, streams, and chatroomsMComms + EcoDevQuick actionopen
Can we collect circles stories somewhere to read and share? Blog, book — beyond Discord and X?MComms + EcoDevQuick actionopen
Shouldn’t we try to engage more tech people in circles, like universities?MEcoDevWritten planopen
EcoDev engineering needs to plug into circles more (mentoring, product, UX design, business)MEcoDevWritten planopen
OS contributions: how do we get everyone connecting dots and turning inquiries into actual contributions?MEcoDev + CouncilWritten planopen
RFPs for non-tech work? e.g. funding local high-impact communitiesMEcoDevWritten planopen
Public YouTube/X streams attract small audiences (10-30). How to grow engagement?MCommsWritten planopen
Better marketing and design for Logos Circles initiatives and projectsMComms + EcoDevAction planopen

Narrative & positioning

Owner: Comms + Council · 13 questions

QuestionPriOwnerFormatStatusNotes
1-liner pitch / narrative?HComms + CouncilQuick actionopenBlocking external comms work
Why should people use Logos to build instead of existing tech, in 1-2 sentences?HComms + CouncilQuick actionopen
Is there a use case where Logos is clearly better than Aztec or other privacy solutions?HComms + CouncilWritten FAQopen
How to address the general tech/crypto backlashHCommsWritten planopen
Can/should we lean into “sovereign tech” / US decoupling, e.g. in the EU?HCouncil + CommsCouncil statementopen
Re: winnable issues — why reinvent the whole stack? Why are Signal + USDT insufficient?HComms + CouncilWritten FAQopen
From a comms perspective, are devs the main target?HCommsComms strategy docopen
How to avoid being perceived externally as “crypto bros” exploiting people for token pumps?HCommsComms strategy docopen
Are we solving common people’s problems, changing web3, or both?HCouncil + CommsCouncil statementopen
Our positioning: compliant privacy / cypherpunk spectrum — USDT/USDC/CEX or guerrilla liquidity rails?HCouncil + CommsCouncil statementopen
Privacy vs agency, tech vs activistsMCouncil + CommsWritten pieceopen
Societal issues are political — can we solve them via tech and not just democracy?MCouncil + CommsWritten pieceopen
Optics of internal/external communicationMCommsWritten planopen

Internal comms & tools

Owner: Ops / IT · 12 questions

QuestionPriOwnerFormatStatusNotes
Information Stack: where to find what you need? Spread all over — hard for new joiners and CCsHOps / ITQuick actionopenPrerequisite for distributing answers
Where is the source of truth for all info?HOps / ITQuick actionopenPrerequisite for distributing answers
Logos formed many teams — not clear who to contactHOpsQuick actionopen
How to improve transparency about new things happening — with CCs and communities?HComms / OpsWritten planopen
Deanonymization in internal chatting softwareHSecurity / OpsPolicy docopen
Make instructions for using the messaging app for non-tech peopleMOps / ITQuick actionopen
Making sure that all onboarding steps and technology is still relevantMOpsQuick actionopen
Broadcast more (internal) demos at townhallMOpsQuick actionopen
Org-wide visibility: offsites generate great info sharing. How to share more throughout the year?MOpsWritten planopen
Vetting apps / 3rd party services that can be retiredMOps / ITQuick actionopen
Ditch DiscordMCouncilCouncil decisionopen
Merge Discord channels / streamline comms channelsMComms / OpsQuick actionopen

Cross-team coordination

Owner: PM / Council · 12 questions

QuestionPriOwnerFormatStatusNotes
How do we align roadmap/prioritization where Status, Logos, and Status Network overlap?HCouncil / PMCouncil statementopen
Will there be more PM effort across Logos teams? Goals keep changing, teams not collaborating efficientlyHCouncil / PMWritten planopen
Specifications: how do we communicate them? People aren’t aware — what should we do?HVac / Eng leadsWritten planopen
Logos Stack map should show responsible teams and be easily reachableHComms / PMQuick actionopen
Better coordination across desired projectsHPM / CouncilWritten planopen
Clearer info pipeline from tech teams to Comms to better highlight the work being builtHComms + Eng leadsWritten planopen
Double down on coherenceHCouncilCouncil statementopen
More consideration when scaling/descaling teams — core team stability mattersHCouncilCouncil statementopen
Process to determine if a PR requires notifying other teamsMEng leads / PMPolicy docopen
Process to discover and propose standard code practicesMEng leadsPolicy docopen
Improve collaboration with Logos StorageMLogos Storage + dependent teamsWritten planopen
Demo from each engineering team weekly — for EcoDev planning and broadcastsMEng leads + EcoDevQuick actionopen

Keycard

Owner: Council + Keycard team · 7 questions

Signal to pay attention to

6 of 7 questions in this category are essentially the same demand: give Keycard a marketing budget and dedicated staff. This is pressure, not questions. A single Council statement with concrete commitments will satisfy this entire bucket. Resolve it together rather than answering each individually.

QuestionPriOwnerFormatStatusNotes
Keycard positioning within IFT — will Keycard possibly become Logos Card?HCouncil + KeycardCouncil statementopen
Keycard: why is there no dedicated marketing staff?HCouncilCouncil statementopen
Give Keycard a real marketing budgetHCouncilCouncil decisionopen
Keycard should be given more attentionHCouncilCouncil decisionopen
Give more marketing resources to KeycardHCouncilCouncil decisionopen
Keycard is amazing — can we help them additionally?MCouncil + KeycardCouncil decisionopen
Will Keycard be integrated with Logos Basecamp API for key management?MKeycard teamWritten FAQopen

Status app

Owner: Status team + Council · 6 questions

QuestionPriOwnerFormatStatusNotes
Status: why is communities delivery still so bad?HStatus teamTeam Q&A sessionopenNeeds direct, unfiltered answer
Status: why not smaller, more frequent releases?HStatus teamTeam Q&A sessionopen
Do you see Status as separate from Logos? Status Network not an execution zone since no more DA?HCouncilCouncil statementopen
Is the future of Status App to be in the Logos App? Can communities build their own and compete?HCouncilCouncil statementopen
Supporting Logos chain in Status — any expectations from IFT?MStatus team + CouncilWritten FAQopen
Can Status App support Logos Circles? (messaging, communities, etc.)MStatus teamWritten FAQopen

Org & people

Owner: Council / People ops · 5 questions

QuestionPriOwnerFormatStatusNotes
Make sure people with expertise have sufficient authority/support — grow experts, don’t just use themHCouncil / People opsPolicy docopen
When will Logos absorb all remaining parts of IFT?HCouncilCouncil statementopen
Hire an engineer with 20+ years experience to act as architect and set up development guidelinesMCouncil / HiringCouncil decisionopen
Engineers/researchers need sufficient time in the problem domain to build intuitionMEng leadsPolicy docopen
Ways to reduce time to market should be baked into planning, implementation, and deliveryMPM / Eng leadsPolicy docopen

Token & economics

Owner: Council / Foundation · 3 questions

Legal review required

These questions need to be pre-cleared with legal before any public statement. Frame answers around roadmap and technical architecture, not investment timelines or tokenomics that could create securities exposure.

QuestionPriOwnerFormatStatusNotes
Token timeline, funding choices — VC? ICO? Presale?HCouncil / FoundationCouncil statementopenRoute through legal
When Logos token?HCouncil / FoundationCouncil statementopenRoute through legal
Liquidity: do we need our own if we have bridges and atomic swaps on day 1? Tap into SOL/ETH?HCouncil / FoundationCouncil statementopenRoute through legal