Logos Assembly

12-audit-trails

3 min read

This document was generated using AI and has yet to be human reviewed

Audit Trails

Validation Layer — Evidence of specification compliance over time

Definition

Audit trails are chronological records that document compliance activities, verification results, and conformance status over time. They provide evidence that specification requirements have been met and continue to be met.

Relationship to the Specification

The specification defines what must be verified. Audit trails document that verification has occurred, when, by whom, and with what results.

Specification RequirementAudit Trail Records
”Authentication required”When auth implementation was tested, results
”Messages must be signed”Signature verification test history
”Delivery SLA of 500ms”Performance measurements over time
”Support for protocol v2”Compliance check dates and outcomes

Core Components

  • Timestamps: When each verification occurred
  • Actors: Who performed or authorized the verification
  • Evidence: What was tested, measured, or reviewed
  • Results: Pass/fail status, measurements, findings
  • References: Links to specification requirements verified
  • Changes: What changed between audits

Dependency Chain

Specification
    ↓
Test Suites ← produce test results
Compliance Checks ← produce conformance reports
    ↓
Audit Trails ← aggregate evidence over time
    ↓
Changelogs ← reference audit evidence for releases
RFCs ← cite audit findings to motivate spec changes

Why Spec-Grounding Matters

Audit trails without specification grounding become meaningless paperwork:

  • Unverifiable claims: “We tested it” without showing what requirements were tested
  • Historical blindness: No record of when compliance was last verified
  • Regression invisibility: No way to know if previously-passing checks now fail
  • Accountability gaps: No trail showing who verified what

Audit Trail Structure

Effective audit trails trace to specification requirements:

# Audit Record: Q1 2024 Compliance Review
 
**Date**: 2024-03-15
**Auditor**: Security Team
**Specification Version**: v2.1.3
**Implementation Version**: v4.2.0
 
## Summary
 
| Category | Requirements | Passed | Failed | N/A |
|----------|-------------|--------|--------|-----|
| Authentication (SPEC-2) | 12 | 12 | 0 | 0 |
| Message Format (SPEC-3) | 24 | 23 | 1 | 0 |
| Delivery (SPEC-4) | 18 | 17 | 0 | 1 |
| Security (SPEC-5) | 15 | 15 | 0 | 0 |
 
## Findings
 
### SPEC-3.4.1 - Message Size Validation [FAILED]
 
**Requirement**: Messages exceeding 64KB SHALL be rejected.
 
**Finding**: Messages of exactly 65536 bytes (64KB) are accepted due to 
off-by-one error in validation logic.
 
**Evidence**: Test case `test_message_size_boundary` 
(results: test_run_20240315.log, line 1247)
 
**Remediation**: Issue #4521 created, fix scheduled for v4.2.1
 
**Previous Status**: PASSED (Q4 2023 audit)
- Regression introduced in commit a1b2c3d (v4.1.0)
 
---
 
### SPEC-4.2.3 - Delivery SLA [PASSED]
 
**Requirement**: 99th percentile delivery time SHALL be under 500ms.
 
**Measurements**:
- Mean: 142ms
- P95: 287ms
- P99: 412ms
- Max: 489ms
 
**Evidence**: Performance test results (perf_test_20240314/)
 
**Trend**: Improved from P99=467ms (Q4 2023)

Audit Trail Types

Continuous Audit

Automated, ongoing verification:

2024-03-15 04:00:00 [AUTOMATED] Compliance suite run
  - 69/69 SPEC requirements: PASS
  - Duration: 47m 23s
  - Build: v4.2.0-rc3
  
2024-03-14 04:00:00 [AUTOMATED] Compliance suite run
  - 68/69 SPEC requirements: PASS
  - 1 FAILURE: SPEC-3.4.1
  - Build: v4.2.0-rc2

Periodic Review

Scheduled comprehensive audits:

  • Quarterly compliance reviews
  • Annual security audits
  • Release certification checks

Event-Triggered Audit

Verification prompted by changes:

  • New specification version released
  • Major implementation changes
  • Security incidents
  • Compliance questions raised

Best Practices

  • Automate audit trail generation from CI/CD pipelines
  • Link audit records to specification requirement IDs
  • Preserve audit trails immutably (version control, append-only logs)
  • Include trend analysis (is compliance improving or degrading?)
  • Document remediations for findings with follow-up verification
  • Maintain audit trails across specification version changes
  • Make audit trails accessible to stakeholders who need them
  • Set retention policies aligned with compliance requirements

Graph View

Backlinks